For the cover story on the Ram Setu controversy in Tehelka this week, I interviewed the VHP-man-in-the-BJP, BP Singhal, brother of Ashok Singhal. BP was more interested in talking about mind, body and soul than about Ram Setu. I listened to him in all seriousness and held myself back from laughing more than once. My photographer colleague, an atheist Muslim, did not reveal his name. So while a brief excerpt appears in the magazine, given below is the part I loved, and it has nothing to do with Ram Setu. Believe you me, it is transcribed word by word from a tape.
*
If there are alternatives, why do they want to demolish the ‘bridge’?
Simply because America is out - have you not been watching the way places of Hindu faith and shraddha have been denigrated!
But what is the motive?
Americans! Americans! Americans and the Christians. I mean, Christians because of Americans and Americans because of Christians, and Christians themselves.
But why?
Do you know what their academy of religion in America gives out? That the trunk of ganesha is like a phallus. For them phallus is visible everywhere. In India it has been called shiv ling. Ling is phallus? What is ling? Ling is the operational part of the particular thing. And what is Mahadev? Mahakaal! That is also Mahadev. Mahakaal ka ling kya hain? Time. Time consumes everything. There was an attempt by Brahma and Vishnu, ki dekhey iskay ling kahan hain. Kahin aadi aur ant hain kya? Toh Brahma ko kahan tum upar jaon hum neechay jaatein hain. And then if we come back with results then we will compare notes. So Vishnu went down, down, down, down, down, down, down and came back after that. Brahma also went up, up, up, up and came back. Usnay kahan ki Vishnu aadi mila? Kahan nahin. Tumko mila? Ant mila? Haan, haan mil gaya. So what is the proof? He said, he had already fixed up tulsi, the most revered flora, and gau, the most revered fauna. Yeh do they toh unsay saksh liya, and they said ki haan ant hain. It was discovered that it was all totally false. Gau ka mukh nahi puchta, aur tulsi ghar main nahi rakh saktay. You keep it outside in the angan. Ab Brahma ka mandir nahi milta. He is not worshipped the way Vishnu is. So that is the operational part, the ling, which is Mahakaal. Mahakaal ka ling kya hain? Time. So if they don’t want to understand that and make their own interpretations…
But why is the UPA government doing this?
Sonia Gandhi is reason enough. Shankaracharya’s humiliation and other things… there is a whole series of charges.
But she insisted the ASI withdraw that affidavit…
Anybody who wants to denigrate another religion, I call him a Christian. You must find out Ambika Soni’s religion. But I deem her a Christian anyway. Because only Christians have come out with voluminous literature denigrating our deities and sons. They call Ramakrishna Paramhans a sodomite. Sodomite!
Sodomite!
Yes, and Vivekananda as a catamite! This book has been written in protest against what they have been preaching there. I’ll just read out this part (reads from the blurb of the book Invading The Sacred : An Analysis of Hinduism Studies in America by Krishnan Ramaswamy, Antonio de Nicolas & Aditi Banerjee): India, once a major civilisation and economic power that suffered centuries of decline, is now newly resurgent in business, geopolitics and culture. However, a powerful counterforce within the American Academy is systematically undermining core icons and ideals of Indic Culture and thought. For instance, scholars of this counterforce have disparaged the Bhagavad-Gita as “a dishonest book”; declared Ganesha’s trunk a “limp phallus”; classified Devi as the “mother with a penis” and Shiva as “a notorious womanizer” who incites violence in India; pronounced Sri Ramakrishna a pedophile who sexually molested the young Swami Vivekananda; condemned Indian mothers as being less loving of their children than white women; and interpreted the bindi as a drop of menstrual fluid and the “ha” in sacred mantras as a woman’s sound during orgasm.
Why is it all so sexual?
Yeah, they are obsessed with sex! Because they are the followers of Freud for whom sex was the highest motivator. When you just vanish, the only real element is the soul. And you take the body as the final, material world, as Marx takes it, Freud took it, or Darwin - he also doesn’t believe in the soul! I consider them the three villains of the whole mankind. Because they divorce man from the only reality that exists in him.
Surprisingly the Muslims are not producing hate literature like this.
They don’t have those brains. They don’t have those brains. They have their sword. They know that once they are in a majority like Kashmir, they’ll either convert or finish off. So they believe in brute force. Unko itna dimag bhi nahin hain. Aur jisnay bhi analysis karnay ki koshish kari, whichever Muslim went deep into this, he became lover of Indian philosophy. Yeh hamari itni vaishvik hain philosophy, so universal and devoted to just human beings. Whoever goes into the depth of it, he becomes a slave of it. You may be a very devout Muslim, please continue your devotion, as Vivekanand says. He was a devout Hindu. What did he say? I want every Christian to be a devout Christian, he said, every Muslim to be a devout Muslim, every Hindu to be a devout Hindu. He never said that everyone should become a Hindu. The RSS and VHP don’t say everyone should be a Hindu. You can have a difference of opinion when they say that after all the Mughals didn’t bring any women, so after all they were all Hindus, their mothers were Hindus, from the m the progeny of Muslims came. They are if not full then half Hindus. Aap yeh keh do ki aap Muslim Hindu ho. They are known as Hindis when they go to Madina for Haj. Wahan Hindi kehlatay ho toh yahan Hindi kehlanay main kya takleef hain tumko? There should be an identity with the soil.
Singhal ka ling kya hain?
TIME will tell, not Tehelka?
Comment by Anand — September 22, 2007 @ 6:34 pm
[...] interviews BP [...]
Pingback by “They don’t have those brains” at Indian Muslims — September 23, 2007 @ 12:41 am
Is BP implying that mahakaal ka ling nahi hai? That will make mahakaal angry. Very very angry.
Comment by Anoop Saha — September 23, 2007 @ 2:33 am
It is hilarious even when it is sinister. Thanks for posting it here. I am amazed how you could ask all those questions with a straight face.
Sodomite! Classic!
Comment by Mohib — September 23, 2007 @ 2:36 am
Just so he knows, Hindi is Arabic for India, that is why Muslims are identified as Hindis in Arabia. In India, all of us, regardless of faith are Hindis- or Indians in English.
Comment by Taha — September 24, 2007 @ 12:42 am
Duh?!
Comment by Soumyadip — September 24, 2007 @ 10:52 am
All i can say about the comment “they don’t have those brains” is lack of islamic history and knowledge, if anyone could refere back to history india also has produced nobel prize winner muslim (i.e APJ Abdul kalam, Sir syed ahamed khan, Ali jinah) its not that we don’t have brain, we are true followers of Prophet fundamentals, certainly we have no issue to be called hindi, its upto our fellow citizen to recognise that rather then asking for proof.
Regarding the Kashmir, please digg into the root cause, they are all fighting for land not for religious, same like LTTE In sri lanka, ULFA in Assam and Naxlies in Andhar Pardesh,
Mughals, please for heaven sake mughals are not the messengers of GOD nor role models of islam, they were invaders with great muslim faith and practicing muslims.
If anybody find this offensive, please pardon, its purely unintentional, i just tried to clear the muslim point of view which i felt responsible being Indian Muslim.
Comment by Ashraf — September 24, 2007 @ 12:42 pm
Good show, Shivam!
Comment by amit varma — September 24, 2007 @ 3:37 pm
[...] is Hindutva defender BP Singhal, as interviewed by Shivam Vij. It is a priceless rant, but its entertainment value is diluted by the fact that many people take [...]
Pingback by BP Singhal, Entertainer - The India Uncut Blog - India Uncut — September 24, 2007 @ 4:30 pm
[...] ഡയലോഗ് കാണണമെങ്കില് ശിവത്തിന്റെ നടുറോട്ടില്നോക്കിയാല് മതി. വി.എച്ച്.പി യുടെ [...]
Pingback by സേതുസമുദ്രം പദ്ധതി കയ്യാങ്കളിയാവുമ്പോള് « തോന്നിയത് തോന്നിയപടി — September 24, 2007 @ 5:15 pm
[...] would it be ok to replace his head with that of an elephant, post decapitation? 374 · dravidian lurker on September 23, 2007 09:35 PM · Direct link is it appropriate to describe a pundit who is going crazy about this controversy as ram-pant? 375 · dravidian lurker on September 24, 2007 01:15 PM · Direct link Singhal explains all - Americans! Americans! Americans and the Christians! [...]
Pingback by Oh, no he DIDN'T! - Sepia Mutiny — September 24, 2007 @ 10:50 pm
Christians are against idol worship but we respect all religions. BP must be insane.
Comment by amrita — September 24, 2007 @ 11:15 pm
The basic problem with these kind of mythological stories is that you tend to look them as stories & overlook at the point behind them.Maybe he wants to express the metaphysics involved but cant express it in good words.
For me this holds true ..
“Yeh hamari itni vaishvik hain philosophy”
Indeed it is universal. The basic diff. in hinduism is that i can laugh out loud on the ‘order’ of beheading karunanidhi !
Comment by vishal — September 24, 2007 @ 11:25 pm
Mahakaal ka ling kya hain?For the cover story on the Ram Setu controversy in Tehelka this week, I interviewed the VHP-man-in-the-BJP, BP Singhal, brother of Ashok Singhal. BP was more interested in talking about mind, body and soul than about Ram Setu. I listened to him in
Pingback by Je pense, donc je suis — September 25, 2007 @ 3:35 am
ha ha ha! that puts the phrase ‘mahadev ka ghantaa’ in perspective. thank you shivam. dhanyavad singhal ji.
Comment by jatin — September 25, 2007 @ 8:29 am
read it over my morn cuppa tea at office. hilarious but BP’s tirade does point a finger at the prejudices and the senselessness of this whole religion deal. and when do we start talking abt the Sethu?;p
Comment by sushmita — September 26, 2007 @ 10:46 am
Dude ! Get a job…and while you’re at it..a life.
Comment by Pappu — September 29, 2007 @ 1:23 pm
Shivam,
Agreed he was not saying it like a sober person, but if you look at the point he is making, I don’t see anything wrong with that.
But this is one of the reasons there is no alternative to Congress from people who gave us the ‘Rath Yatra’
My 2 c
Comment by Sachin Kumar — October 6, 2007 @ 2:01 am